Understanding how interest and dividend income is divided during a divorce can be a complex issue, especially under Illinois law. Illinois divorce lawyer Russell D. Knight (https://rdklegal.com/interest-and-dividend-income-in-an-illinois-divorce/) of the Law Office of Russell D. Knight offers a comprehensive breakdown of how this type of income is handled during divorce proceedings in his most recent article. His work highlights how interest, dividends, and other forms of passive income can significantly impact the financial outcomes of both spouses.
Illinois divorce lawyer Russell D. Knight emphasizes that dividing the assets themselves is only part of the process; income generated from those assets must also be considered when calculating child support and spousal maintenance. This includes income from investments, businesses, and rental properties. “If those assets generate some kind of income via rents, interest, dividends, etc., then that income must be factored into any maintenance or child support calculations,” Knight writes.
Illinois divorce lawyer Russell D. Knight also explains that the Illinois courts use the totality of a party’s gross income — not just their salary — to determine support obligations. This means income from stocks, bonds, S-corporations, and other financial assets are part of the equation. He clarifies that the law in Illinois defines income broadly: “All income is income under Illinois law,” meaning even passive gains must be included in financial disclosures and court determinations.
Russell D. Knight outlines the tools divorcing spouses can use to uncover hidden streams of interest or dividend income. These include reviewing tax documents like 1099-INT and 1099-DIV forms and submitting formal legal requests such as a Notice To Produce. These steps ensure that all sources of income are accounted for and fairly addressed in court proceedings.
One unique aspect of Knight’s analysis is his discussion of imputed income — income courts can attribute to a spouse even if it's not actively received. Courts have wide discretion in Illinois and may assign a hypothetical income to an asset based on its fair earning potential. Knight references past cases in which courts have included projected interest income from cash assets when calculating spousal support. However, he also notes the limitations and legal challenges that can arise when this tactic is used.
In high-asset divorces, the issue of asset appreciation also plays a critical role. Russell D. Knight addresses whether unrealized gains — such as the increasing value of stock or property — should be considered income for support purposes. Citing Illinois case law, he explains that courts have recognized increases in wealth as qualifying income in some situations. “[The money received] represented a valuable benefit to the father that enhanced his wealth and facilitated his ability to support [the child],” one case reads.
Knight also explores the complications surrounding S-corporations. In these cases, the owner of the corporation controls whether profits are distributed or retained. This means a spouse may deliberately suppress their income by not releasing corporate profits during a divorce. Russell D. Knight warns readers to scrutinize S-corporation earnings closely, especially if one spouse has the power to manipulate those figures for legal advantage. Courts may only consider retained corporate earnings as income if there’s evidence that they were used to avoid paying proper support.
In addition, Knight explains how courts evaluate income generated by a business's goodwill — the intangible value a business may have due to reputation or unique skill. If that goodwill has already been divided during the divorce, then any future income stemming from it may not be subject to support calculations, a point that can significantly affect settlement negotiations and outcomes.
This detailed guidance shows that interest and dividend income — along with other passive income streams — can carry weight in determining how property is divided and what support payments will look like. For individuals going through a divorce in Illinois, failing to disclose or account for this income could lead to unfair outcomes or further legal complications.
Russell D. Knight’s insights help clarify a complex part of Illinois family law, giving individuals a clearer picture of how financial assets and income types are considered in court. His practical, case-law-backed explanations show why it’s important for divorcing spouses to take a full inventory of all financial sources, not just traditional paychecks.
Anyone navigating an Illinois divorce should be aware that income from interest, dividends, and businesses can influence child support and spousal maintenance. Misreporting or failing to properly value these sources can result in unjust rulings or later modifications.
Russell D. Knight continues to make Illinois divorce law more understandable by tackling challenging financial topics with transparency and clarity. His article is a must-read for those dealing with income-generating assets during a divorce.
About Law Office of Russell D. Knight:
The Law Office of Russell D. Knight is dedicated to helping clients navigate divorce and family law matters in Illinois. With hundreds of published articles and a commitment to simplifying complex legal issues, the firm provides practical legal guidance rooted in real courtroom experience.
Embeds:
Youtube Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3DH9XFHhT8
GMB: https://www.google.com/maps?cid=13056420905624162796
Email and website
Email: russell@rdklegal.com
Website: https://rdklegal.com/
Media Contact
Company Name: Law Office of Russell D. Knight
Contact Person: Russell D. Knight
Email:Send Email
Phone: (773) 334-6311
Address:1165 N Clark St #700
City: Chicago
State: Illinois 60610
Country: United States
Website: https://rdklegal.com/
